How meaning is represented in the brain is still one of the big open questions in neuroscience. Does a word (e.g., bird) always have the same representation, or does the task under which the word is processed alter its representation (answering can it fly?)? The brain activity of subjects who read the same word while performing different semantic tasks has been shown to differ across tasks. However, it is still not understood how the task itself contributes to this difference. In the current work, we study Magnetoencephalography (MEG) brain recordings of participants tasked with answering questions about concrete nouns.

Summary and Contributions: This paper presents a re-analysis of the MEG experiment of Sudre et al (2012), where participants were tasked with responding to a question about the meaning of an object concept word (e.g. In the original Sudre et al analysis, the focus was on testing the predictive power of different perceptual and semantic feature models of the concept word for the MEG data. In the current study, the focus is on the role of the task question that precedes the concept word, and in particular whether and how the semantics of the task question modulates the subsequent processing and neural activity time-locked to the stimulus word. This is an interesting neurocognitive question, as it sheds light on how lexical-semantic representation and access can be modulated by the preceding context, and how the timing of processing of the target concept word that is independent of the task demands relates to the timing of the processing that involves integrating that conceptual knowledge with the task requirements in order to respond on the task. To analyze the data, the authors construct vector-based semantic models of both the concept words and the task questions, using human responses from separate questions and concepts where the participants rated the truth of the task questions for the concepts.

Understanding how the tasks that we perform while perceiving a stimulus modulate brain activity is of wide interest to neuroscience. Reviewers found the experimental setup interesting, with the clear hypotheses about how tasks can impact neural activity. The small effect sizes observed were identified as a key limitation in drawing conclusions from this experiment. Reviewers found this worrisome particularly when coupled with marginal accuracies and few subjects. Reviewers identified that BERT results were not very conclusive, and significantly more could be done.

How meaning is represented in the brain is still one of the big open questions in neuroscience. Does a word (e.g., bird) always have the same representation, or does the task under which the word is processed alter its representation (answering can you eat it?" The brain activity of subjects who read the same word while performing different semantic tasks has been shown to differ across tasks. However, it is still not understood how the task itself contributes to this difference. In the current work, we study Magnetoencephalography (MEG) brain recordings of participants tasked with answering questions about concrete nouns.

Research on human reading has long documented that reading behavior shows task-specific effects, but it has been challenging to build general models predicting what reading behavior humans will show in a given task. We introduce NEAT, a computational model of the allocation of attention in human reading, based on the hypothesis that human reading optimizes a tradeoff between economy of attention and success at a task. Our model is implemented using contemporary neural network modeling techniques, and makes explicit and testable predictions about how the allocation of attention varies across different tasks. We test this in an eyetracking study comparing two versions of a reading comprehension task, finding that our model successfully accounts for reading behavior across the tasks. Our work thus provides evidence that task effects can be modeled as optimal adaptation to task demands.